In Brown’s senatorial career he
proposed forty-eight bills, only one of which passed. This does not mean that they were bad bills
or were too partisan. All of the failed
bills never made it out of committee, meaning that technically he has a record
of 1-0 with regards to floor votes. Some
of the bills which never made it out of committee were a bill to reform federal
acquisition practices, a bill to make lying about military service a crime, a
bill to allow the VA to assist families of injured veterans obtain affordable
housing, a bill to reduce business taxes on small businesses which employ
veterans, a bill to increase aid to elderly crime victims, and a bill to
establish a summer employment program for teenagers. Hardly a partisan hack. The bill which did successful pass, the DART
Act, creates stronger financial oversight for the Department of Homeland
Security. The bill, which passed the
Senate unanimously on November 28, 2012, has gone to the House.
Additionally, Brown has only missed
a single vote during his senatorial career.
He has attended seven hundred thirty-seven votes out of a possible seven
hundred thirty-eight. That is
astonishing, especially compared to other non-leadership position
senators. To compare Scott with a similar
senator, let us take a look at Dean Heller, a Republican from Nevada. Heller was appointed to his seat initially,
following the resignation of Senator John Ensign. Heller has been eligible to vote in four
hundred floor votes during his tenure, but he has missed thirty. While it is true that the majority of these
missed votes came during the 2012 election when Heller had to officially win
his seat (which he did), it should be noted that Brown had to run a campaign as
well, yet managed to miss only one vote.
Also, campaigning to keep one’s job should hardly be an excuse to miss
time at said job.
Brown has also not been afraid to
cross the aisle when it comes to voting on legislation as well. The issue most in the news the past few days
has been the failure of the Senate to ratify the United Nations treaty to ban
discrimination against disabled individuals.
Any treaty must pass the Senate with two-thirds of the votes, which
today is sixty-seven. Every Democrat
voted in favor of the treaty, but they needed sixteen Republicans to vote for
it as well. Only eight, however, did so,
Brown among them. In fact, a study
conducted by Congressional Weekly found that Brown was the second most
bipartisan senator of the past two years, voting with his party only 54% of the
time.
The purpose of this post is not to
disparage Warren. Hopefully she will
become a leader in the Democratic Party and serve her state well. But politics, particularly Congressional
politics, is a numbers game. While each
party always wants to be in the majority, neither can ever have all the seats
in either the House or the Senate.
Because of this, the number of seats a party holds is no more important
than who holds the seats of the opposing party.
Democrats would have been justified in cheering if Warren defeated Tom
Coburn, an extremely conservative Republican senator, but instead Warren removed
one of the most moderate Republicans, which will only result in the party
becoming more polarized, at least in the Senate.
Govtrack.us, a wonderful website
which tracks members of Congress and virtually every piece of legislation
proposed, charts all senators by a leadership score on the y-axis and an
ideology score on the x-axis. Brown does
not score particularly high in the leadership score, but the main area of
interest is the ideology score. Brown is
ranked as the third most moderate Republican behind Olympia Snowe and Susan
Collins (ranked the most bipartisan senator in the aforementioned study), both
from Maine. However, with Snowe’s
retirement and Brown’s defeat, this leaves Collins as the only truly moderate
Republican left in the Senate. Due to
the fact that the Democrats still do not have a filibuster-proof
super-majority, the party needs to find Republicans to compromise with, of which
there are now two fewer.
One can hope that this is not the end of Brown’s
political career. Given his bipartisan
history and strong support for veteran rights and outright, a savvy political
move by President Obama could be to appoint him to a post in the Department of
Veterans Affairs. This would not only
keep the political career of an important moderate Republican alive, but also
show a willingness and ability by Obama to work with Republicans on important
issues.
I wish Elizabeth Warren the best of
luck when her six year term begins in January, but I also mourn the loss of an
important entrepȏt into bipartisan compromise.
Warren can make up for this by working with Republicans as opposed to
against them. At this time in our nation’s
history, with an unsustainable debt crisis threatening to plunge us into
another depression, we Congress to work as a house united, for we all know the
saying about a divided house.
No comments:
Post a Comment