In
2010, “Despite our hardships, our Union is strong.” In 2011, “…and the state of our Union is
strong…” In 2012, “…and the state of our
Union will always be strong…” and in 2013, “…we can say with renewed confidence
that the state of our Union is stronger…”
While
I am perfectly aware that the State of the Union address has been little more
than an American pep rally for years, the blatant lying which President Obama
has committed in every State of the Union address he has delivered is
startling. What exactly is it about our
union that is strong? Is it the
crippling polarization which has created such deep divisions that our parties
can scarcely agree on what time it is, let alone undertake the pressing issues
which face our nation? Is it the very
slow economic recovery which still forces millions of job-seeking Americans to
rely on unemployment benefits? Or
perhaps it is the debilitating fear of gun violence sweeping the country.
That
being said, there were a few bright spots within the president’s hour long
speech, although even these will likely be blotted out by partisan resistance. In what was a fairly clear attempt to appeal
to Republicans, President Obama called for, “…not a bigger government…but a
smarter government…” A smarter
government is indeed a noble goal, as ours is already large and reducing its
size to the degree many Republicans desire is simply impossible. An intelligent government which streamlines
regulations, closes tax loopholes, and eliminates bulky bureaucracy would not
only increase the revenue our nation generates but also allow that revenue to
be spent in a more efficient manner.
Two
areas which the president pointed out as a vital areas which ought to receive
that efficient spending are infrastructure and education. As a lifelong resident of the Rust Belt, I
can assure you that our nation’s infrastructure is in bad need of repair. The amount of bridges I have driven over and
under which appear to be moments away from collapsing defies logic. Some will say that such repairs should not be
the federal government’s concern; rather, they would prefer the states to
handle these projects. These critics are
willfully ignorant of the national nature of practically every road in that
country. The United States is such a
complexly interconnected nation that a bridge collapse anywhere has economic
impacts almost everywhere.
Education
was another prominent plank in President Obama’s speech. He called for universal access to adequate
preschool education for every child in America.
As often reported, better educated individuals are more likely to be
successful and responsible citizens than their education-deficient
counterparts. The president also cited
the success of his Race to the Top program, a competition amongst states to
reform their education systems in order to receive more federal dollars. While Republicans may hate federal government
spending on education, there are few things states love more than receiving federal
grants to fund projects. Overall,
however, President Obama’s segment on education was heavy in ideas but light on
suggestions. He called for many things,
but proposed few concrete solutions.
This is of course the nature of such addresses, but disappointing
nonetheless.
Another
entertaining aspect of the State of the Union was the subtle, but noticeable,
blame shifting the president conducted.
While never outright assigning fault to Congress, it was visible that he
attempted to slip in the idea that it is Congress’ fault for the stagnation of
the government, not his. First was the
call to end manufactured crises such as the debt ceiling and fiscal cliff
debacles. Then there were the times he
said “send me that bill.” This served as
a reminder that the president cannot do much independently of Congress.
The
most disappointing aspect of the address—aside from the incessant clapping with
scant cause—was when President Obama turned to voting. When any American, he said, is denied the
right to vote due to long waiting lines, sometimes in excess of five hours, “we
are betraying our ideals.” Incredibly
long lines to vote is indeed a gross, and frankly shocking, flaw in our
electoral system, but the president passed up the chance to attack an even
greater threat to voting rights: voter ID laws.
These laws, passed by numerous states in the run-up to the 2012
election, require voters to present photo IDs in order to vote, instead of
simply a proof of ID. It has been
speculated that these laws would have a discriminatory effect, blocking
predominantly minority voters. Even if
that is false, the laws still violate the Constitution. It only eludes the mind of a fool that such
laws violate the Twenty-Fourth Amendment, outlawing any form of poll tax. These laws, which require citizens to
purchase a photo ID to vote, are undeniably a poll tax. President Obama missed a chance to make this
point to the millions of Americans who watched the address live and read
newspaper accounts of it the next day. A
true shame.
President
Obama delivered a fine speech on Tuesday.
He spoke with his usual cadence, offered up a few new ideas in what was
otherwise a summary of the problems faced by our nation, and avoided any large
controversies. The president laid out
several areas where America needs progress.
Here’s hoping that next year, we hear about the progress made, not the
progress desired.
No comments:
Post a Comment